Margaret's Column

Home About The Books The Bretton Katt Alliance-Chapter One Nostra Sylvania-Chapter One Margaret's Column Science Fiction List-Books Science Fiction List-Movies Contact Welcome To My Slide Show

Thirty Years and Counting

February 17, 2009

I don’t remember exactly when I began the story of the Lorrondons. So much of it existed only in my head for so long-as much of it still does. I know that by the late winter of 1979, when I began to write things down, these people were already becoming known to me. So, the beginning must have been the fall of 1978. I was twelve.

I was also perfectly miserable, both in my own mood and to other people. We had moved a year and a half earlier, and I still missed the large trees in the backyard of my former home. I was doing poorly in school, and had no wish to improve (I wouldn’t until the ninth grade). I skipped a lot of school and spent the time listening to records and reading.

Tolkien was my lifeline, as he was for so many unhappy kids. By the end of the school year, my grades had picked up (a smidge) and I had already lost track of how many times I had read The Lord of the Rings. I seldom went away without my copy of The Tolkien Reader. I read a wonderful novel called The Book of the Dun Cow. I read the romances of Barbara Cartland, more for her descriptions of historical setting than for the romances themselves. I discovered Norse mythology and Iceland's bloody, brooding history told in the sagas. I read a lot of things I don’t remember in detail.

And I began a story of my own, like many other kids with a penchant for science-fiction and fantasy. The long tale of this family of mixed Galactic heritage(Terran and Neoran) came to me in pieces. Scraps of the Lorrondon children’s childhoods, how treachery and lust for power tore their lives apart, and how they survived and in some cases, prevailed.

For years I wrote nothing but scraps. Episodes, incidents, family trees, charts, lists of planets. It wasn’t until 1990 that I began anything like a complete manuscript. I still have hundreds of pages of scenes, Many will be in the books, but much changed (and, I hope, improved). Many will not. All of the principal characters were there from the beginning, Rusorin, Rob Lorrondon, Enrik Ratt, Anna Helsak, Walsam (the earliest name still in use). The overall story of galactic war and the efforts to build peace has never changed.

Like the tales that inspired me, this story was never happy, but it wasn’t quite as grim as Njal’s Saga. A few years ago I read through some of those old sketches and was amazed at how many of the things I wrote down had to do with death, or battle, or estrangement.

From the beginning I was interested in the romance of space itself; the distances, the incredible things like nebulae and black holes, and the possibility of other peoples out there. My galaxy was never as crowded as Gene Roddenberry’s or George Lucas’s. Space travel is a lonely and dangerous endeavor.

Even as I wrote more and more things down, and filled in more and more aspects of this world, I knew I was years a way from being able to write this story, or to write it the way I felt it deserved. I served a long apprenticeship, reading everything, fiction and nonfiction alike. Tolkien, Faulkner, Le Guin, Clarke, Poe, Undset, Woolf, Lessing-these were among my teachers. In college I majored in English, and continued to write out scenes. If you want to learn to write, read. That’s no guarantee, of course, but it’s the best training you’ll get.

It wasn’t until the late nineties that I finished the first book, The Bretton Katt Alliance. For one thing, it took years for me to decide what was necessary to the story, and what wasn’t. How many books would I need to tell the story-or rather, how many books could I break this into. I decided on six. I didn’t want to put out eight-hundred-page tomes when three to four hundred could do the job.

The book was self-published almost two years ago now. I’m still foolishly pleased when somebody likes it. We’re never the best critics of our own work, but I think my book is pretty good. Will it Teach People Anything? Is it inspiring, enlightening, life-changing? Darned if I know. Those calls are for other people to make, not me. I’m just telling a story, one that’s important to me, and that I hope will become important to other people.

And after thirty years, I will see this through to the end, sweet or bitter.

Tags: le guin, science-fiction, self-publishing, the lorrondon cycle, tolkien, writing


Posted at: 12:59 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink RSS

Transcending Genre

February 9, 2009

Sometimes nothing sticks in my craw as much as the word ‘genre’. And why is this? I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen variations on the following sentence: ‘This remarkable book transcends the genre’. Why is genre something that must be ‘transcended’ for a work to have merit?

Genre labels are limiting, constricting writers (and film makers) into stylistic straitjackets. Slap such a label on a book, and automatically, the cliches, ahem, spring to mind. Fantasy: That’s wizards and elves, right? Mysteries: Where’s the wry detective with baggage? Science fiction: Cue the Star Trek theme and snide comments about large-breasted women wearing as little clothing as possible. Historical fiction: That’s just a bodice-ripper.

Not always.

How does something ‘transcend’ its genre?

The phrase is used mostly by reviewers who don’t normally read the genre in question, and liked the book anyway. Therefore, the book can’t possibly be a typical specimen of that genre. It was too thought-provoking; the characters are too fully realized. The book was just too darn good. It must be an exception.

How many exceptions must there be before we realize that the rule itself might be bogus?

Let’s take mysteries. These days nobody writes so well about class conflict as British writer Ruth Rendell. Her books frequently hinge on missed communications, misunderstandings, and savage class resentments (I recommend A Judgement in Stone). Yet her books are shelved as ‘mysteries’, not literature; she gets Edgars, not Bookers. After all, she’s just a genre writer.

The same is true of Walter Mosely, whose Easy Rawlins books are about the postwar, extra-Southern black experience. I knew nothing of this world before I read Mosely’s work, and I’m grateful to him for showing it to me. Yet Easy Rawlins is a detective, and people get murdered. Nothing serious here, just simple entertainment.

Ugh.

The same is true of Ursula LeGuin, (sci-fi) and Terry Pratchett, (fantasy). Their work is sociological and psychological; their invented worlds make us see things in our own we might have missed. (Pratchett also makes good use of satire to achieve this.) Yet they too, are seldom taken as seriously as they deserve. Le Guin has won a Pulitzer, but not for any of her brilliant science-fiction.

I think that everyone loses by this. Writers don’t get the credit they deserve. Readers who decide they ‘just don’t care for that genre’ cheat themselves of wonderful books and stunt their own imaginations.

In on-line discussion groups, the most interesting, insightful people read all across the spectrum and readers who limit themselves only to Serious Literature (stuff that wins National Book Awards) can be as dull witted as the worst sci-fi/fantasy-only fan boys-and-gurlz.

This is also true of writers; the best work comes from people who read everything. Science-fiction writer Dan Simmons taught high-school English for a number of years; he has a passion for Keats and Marcel Proust, which he weaves brilliantly into his books. I’ve read work by writers who read nothing but genre; it’s pallid and limp.

Wider interests-and respect for those interests-are to everyone’s benefit. The next time you feel like dissing ‘genre’ fiction, read some instead-you might find a whole new vista open up.

Tags: dan simmons, fantasy, genre fiction, ruth rendell, science fiction, ursula le guin, walter mosely


Posted at: 12:22 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink RSS

Posts by Date

Recent Posts

Archives